There are many celebrities who celebrate using powerful weapons to trophy hunt. I need not remind you whom. Lots of people do this, and brag about their trophies on Social Media, with photos of the dead animals placed as if they were sleeping. Twitter bans some of them! Sometimes.
There are those who see no problem in baiting animals in order to hunt them. Or they use dogs to help bring down their intended victims. Recently, in Northern Ontario, Six people pled guilty to illegal and unsafe hunting. These hunters think that Canadian laws do not apply to them.
I understand that an animal that is no longer afraid of humans, like the bears around here, should be trapped and moved. If is is beyond saving, or there is no place to take it, then it should be safely euthanized. Mind you, bears attacking humans is very, very rare. Usually, it seems to me, it is people feeding wild animals, and getting them used to humans that leads to issues.
Myths abound around, promoted by those claiming hunting as conservation:
1. You can control populations using trophy hunting.
2. You can reduce wildcat/human negative encounters.
3. It reduces animal predation on livestock.
4. It reduces predation on wild animals.
There are some interesting 'discussions' about this notion: hunting as conservation. Our new neighbours went on a trophy hunt in Nevada. They own property in Alabama and showed a photo of an AK 10 they used hunting. The husband posted the sad photo on Facebook, and they got a lot of flack back from it from locals. (This is the neighbour who is lobbying to open a gun range.) They took that image down.
There are many people in the area who hunt ethically. They don't bait them. They don't tree the animals with dogs. They limit their take, and do not take money from people who want to hunt on their properties.
We filmed moose in Algonquin Park (2010) |
This issue was raised recently when Derek Wolfe (football star) celebrated his hunt and told the story about his hunt for a Mountain Lion. It is a sad story. They call it to 'run a lion' when they release hounds who follow a lion track, until it is chased up a tree where they shoot it. In this case it was a problem animal, which in Canada falls under ministry legislation.
By now, you’ve probably seen the photo of former Bronco defensive lineman Derek Wolfe and the enormous mountain lion he recently shot in his home state of Colorado.
There are studies which have debunked this conservation theory, hunting to manage populations:
The results of these comparisons concur with a growing number of regional studies that find no consistent evidence that sport hunting is functioning as an effective management tool. It may, in fact, be having the opposite results. It is becoming evident that under the guidelines of adaptive management, in the absence of evidence of its efficacy, state agencies should refrain from prescribing sport hunting as a management tool."
––Laundré JW, Papouchis C (2020) The Elephant in the room: What can we learn from California regarding the use of sport hunting of pumas (Puma concolor) as a management tool?. PLOS ONE 15(2): e0224638. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224638
What did they find? That targeting problem animals, as in California, where they do not use hunting as conservation, there is no difference in animal/human conflict. No escalation.
Janet Pesaturo, who wrote the book I reviewed on camera trapping, wrote to me:
Yes, in parts of the US, predator hatred runs deep, but it also runs along the political divide. On the extreme right wing, people think it's their duty to annihilate as many predators as possible, so yes, we see our share of that. Predator conservation and management are very controversial topics, especially in the western states.This article mentions the study: "Evidence Does Not Support Hunting As A Way To Control Cougars: Study."
🐅 🦓 🐘 🦒 🦌 🦁 🐺
STORIES from Ontario abound citing fines for illegal hunting:
9 comments:
Hari OM
A post particular to the States and Canada, I suppose - though I do know that France and Germany have similar 'discussions'. Here in the UK, hunting is very highly regulated, and, in Scotland particularly, licenses of all sorts are required. The hunting is specific to grouse and red deer, the populations of which are very well monitored, and, of course, the animals go into the food chain - definitely not for trophies (albeit, some possibly preserve the heads of stags). The argument of conservation in this is that - left to themselves - the populations of these species would become hazardous to the environment and limited land availability.... YAM xx
Trophy hunts are not conservation. They are not even hunting.
Very well-researched and documented essay. I do not hunt, although I must admit to have "plinked" rats at a local dump with a .22 back when it was not unusual to see me on the way, riding a bike with a rifle across the handlebars. I abhor indiscriminate killing, but do not oppose legal hunting and even benefit from the revenue collected from hunters to preserve and expand natural habitats.
I don't hunt, and right now I don't know anybody who does. When I was a child Daddy hunted deer and turkey in season. I remember when he switched to a bow and arrow and how excited we were when he had success with that. As I recall, the whole process was strictly regulated.
Revolting.
Trophy hunting is abominable IMO.
Trophy shooting, I hate that idea. But in Alaska and further north, hunting for food is a necessity, I understand one moose will feed a family for many many meals!!! Hope the others get fined accordingly. No need for semi automatics either.
It's all sad. Love the "decoy moose" that caught illegal hunters. Linda in Kansas
I hate it myself, though I know it is necessary in parts of NFLD. If the moose population got out of control, havoc would rein! (As well as disease). We are so happy to see the moose population starting to grow in our immediate area. No one hunts here and the moose do stay close. Our neighbour had THREE in his yard last week! That makes five individuals sighted by me personally!
Post a Comment