Showing posts with label gun club. Show all posts
Showing posts with label gun club. Show all posts

Monday, 6 March 2023

The Proposed New Gun Range – an update...

 

The Proposed New Gun Range an update... it's been a journey! 

Yes, a gun range in a provincially significant wetland!

SUMMARY – March 5th

The Peer Review of the Noise Survey by WSP Golder is in, and it says exactly what I stated at the Oct. 11th meeting, based on our research. Also, the old gun range needs to be cleaned up since there are years of heavy metals being left here. The OPP have a contract to do so, but the details are secret. The Steering Committee has put in a Freedom of Information application to find the details.

the original gun range

The WSP Golder Peer Review calls for a new Noise Survey, using site-specific protocols, i.e. 'worst case scenario.' BT Engineering did not use the proper Ministry methods. It failed to cite their methodology, nor the weapons used, or how many. WSP Golder calls for the acoustic survey to be redone. Zanderplan consultants will have to rewrite their report. Then another Peer Review will have to occur. We are back to where we were in the fall, basically.
gun range alley with club house

DETAILS

I can summarize all this. They will have to do another noise survey based on predictable worst-case conditions. This is exactly what I said at the October meeting, and it is what the law requires. Worst case scenario is with all 12 shooting range targets used at once, as my audio demonstrates. There is no way to monitor any activity. Once they get a rezoning, they can do what they want when they want.
 Also, skeet shooting, trapping, and a variety of weapons that could be fired. 

Basically, the Noise Survey failed to comply with the Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks Noise Pollution Control guidelines. Zanderplan is the company consulted by the gun range applicant and they outsourced the acoustic survey to BT Engineering. The study failed to show how the gun range activities would comply with applicable MECP noise limits. [This is the original Zanderplan Consultation Report. This is the acoustic report: BT Engineering Noise Survey.]

Based on this peer review, WSP Golder does not come to the same conclusion as the original Zanderplan report: that the site can operate in compliance with applicable noise limits with maximum 6 shooters. As per the Noise Pollution Control guidelines, the assessment of compliance of site activities should be through the use of the Logarithmic Mean Impulse Sound Level (LLM) descriptor. The applicable compliance noise level limit is directly tied to the expected number of impulsive events in a given hour. The C2 Noise Impact Studies protocols are very clear (Ontario government).
This is our submission on Oct. 11th:

Here is my audio of the OPP doing their recertification from 2017. This was May, when the leaves were not out. 




A further study, the Peer Review states, should have these conditions in mind: 


The site-specific noise model should consider ‘the Predictable Worst-case Conditions’ and be setup meeting MECP configuration requirements. The site-specific noise model should consider: 
  • The maximum number of impulses in a given hour; 
  • The maximum quantity of firearms being used concurrently;
  • The type of firearm used;
  • The calibre and grains of powder per round;
  • The directional nature of the firearm used;
  • The activity (i.e., trap versus target); 
  • The consideration of all noise sources on site. Both; steady state and impulsive sources; and 
  • Consider various seasons the range could be operational (i.e., ground cover and existence or non-existence of foliage).
This is a useful chart
but suppressors are illegal in Canada.

Wednesday, 12 October 2022

I did my duty!

 Here I am at 4:40 a.m., writing my post. Usually I had my posts planned a couple of days in advance. Protesting this new gun club has me betwixt and between. We took off at 4:30 p.m. Tuesday, to go to our council chambers for the 5 p.m. meeting. In the beginning, we felt as if it was only us who objected to the noise. We felt alone and vulnerable, potential targets, if you get the pun. That changed.

Momentum was building as neighbour told neighbour about the potential gun club. We'd only been told about it two weeks ago, by a passing neighbour. From there word spread from concerned resident to concerned resident.  

With the leaves down,
you can see where the forest begins again.
The wetland cleans the water as it goes back
into Otty Lake and the aquifer.

The house and 120 acres sold this year for $606,000. The previous owner sold up after losing her husband. I'd actually visited the home as a volunteer several years ago. The YouTube video of the property is amazing: 120 acres, lots of wetland . Our wetlands are so precious and so fragile. 


The room had to be reset, as they had had only a capacity of 30 during COVID. They wisely brought in chairs for 65. When we arrived there were several residents waiting to go. JB snagged us front row seats. I was vibrating with energy. As we waited for the meeting to start, the room filled. It was standing room only in the hallway. It was nerve wracking as we didn't know if supporters of the gun club would be there.

There was a sign-in sheet for people arriving, name, email, address. We were curious about who would come, who was impacted by this gun club, and who might object. None of us who moved in after the OPP shooting range was created had been told about it. No one was asked if they should create it in the very beginning.

The Township Planner presented a PowerPoint, which was quite comprehensive. He'd used the data I'd provided and the background I gave him and done his own research. I have the letters the OPP had given residents near to the OPP Recertification range from 2014 to 2019. He photocopied them all. In the PPT was a list of people who supported the proposal (17) vs. a formal list of names of those against it (61). Those supporting the proposal did not reveal their addresses. 

The township's Official Plan states that the Plan's purpose is "to create a suitable acoustical environment for the residents." This should be full stop here. 

Add to that the government's Provincial Policy Statement (2020 PDF) regarding planning and land use, speaks very carefully to wetland management.

wetland walkies in winter

The gun club proponent read his speech, suggesting that the gun range will bring tourist dollars to town, despite strict rules about transporting guns to and from a gun range. He said that his gun range should be grandfathered, despite it violating the zoning by-laws. There are a lot of homes nearby. The range isn't that far from any of us. He mentioned my name twice, as if it was only us complaining. I was quite shocked.

aerial view

This is the view from the highway.


There are a lot of homes ignored by the BTE acoustic report

They identified two locations (X),
but ignored many others (X)

I read my speech, vibrating with rage. I wasn't afraid, just couldn't believe what we have to do. I testified at an inquest 40 years ago, and while I was shaken then, I wasn't nearly this upset. 

RCMP write about Impulsive Sounds

1.6.3 Impulsive Sounds

The noise from firearms is described as being “impulsive,” which signifies that the sound lasts for only a very short period of time, typically less than 1 second. Impulsive sounds are so short that even the fast meter response is not fast enough to give a true maximum level.

The overall energy of a series of impulsive noises from firearms is correctly described by means of a Leq measurement. However, there is doubt that the Leq measurement adequately describes the community response to impulsive sound because of the startling effect such noise can have. This problem can be overcome by adding a penalty to the measured Leq value. In the 1971 version of ISO 1996 [14], a 5 dB penalty is recommended for impulsive noise. Other research has indicated penalties of 7 dB [25], 10 dB [10] or 12 dB [29]. 


JB spoke after several others. He explained that he used guns on the farm. He also explained that we had hired the proponent several times: the toilet replacement, our lower deck repairs. We've bought wood from him several times. It's nothing personal, it is just the noise.

Speaker after speaker brought up the impact the gun noise had on them on the lake (2 km away). You can see from Google Earth the 12 gun lanes and the bog right beside it. This is shameful. Another point made was that the metals remaining from 20+ years of use in as a gun range, there is much cleanup to do. There is a clean up Plan I and Plan II to ameliorate the mess in the ground, but it hasn't begun. They will involve the Rideau Valley Conservation Authority in that process. There are "known soil exceedances" (i.e., metals) on the gun range. 


For us: it is the noise. This is the same for Amy Millar, there representing her father, Ian Millar. She spoke eloquently about the issues she faces raising her horses, and giving lessons to students while listening to gunfire. Ian Millar was on a plane, having not been given proper notice about this issue. Very few of us had. None knew the extent of the noise, and how far it travels. Handgun noise can travel 1.6 km and long guns 3 km away. Their horses are worth millions of dollars. 

The distance from Ian Millar's field
to the 12-lane gun range.

There is a statue in Perth of Ian Millar
 on his horse, Big Ben. 

As I left, I checked the sign-in sheets and there appeared to be 90 people there. The proponent, and his Safety/Gun expert Jeremy, as well as a Zanderplan rep. None but the proponent and his Safety Officer for the club spoke in favour. Now we wait for next steps. It'll come back to Council who will yay or nay it. There will be another meeting. If they decided to let this fly, there is a tribunal at which we can speak since we spoke at this meeting. Then it goes to the provincial firearms office in Orillia. If you've hung in here reading, thank you! I wanted to get it all straight in my own mind. I keep waking to that hamster wheel in my head. 

In my speech I was complaining about the lack of proper evaluations of the Impulse Noise, and played the sound for the group. Happily they'd passed around a microphone and I just put it beside my laptop speaker after introducing it. 

gunfire from Jennifer Jilks on Vimeo.


UPDATES: newspaper coverage