Thursday 16 March 2023

Perth Golf Course – Caivan Development

There have been several local articles about this story. I've been following it. We don't live in the town (pop. 6469, in 2021), we live in a different rural township, BTW. The golf club is a small, very old course. I spent hours on the golf course yesterday <= this was 2014 when I took photos of the golf tournament fundraiser. I did this for 2013, as well: Happy times on the golf course! They state that they are the oldest permanent golf course in Canada (since 1890).

 Caivan has invested more than $12 million in this proosed development. Caivan has been appearing before Perth Council seeking the proper permissions. You can see the 18 holes of the golf course, with the town of Perth being where the red pin sits. The golf course will go to a 9-hole course. The golf course didn't do well during COVID. 

The golf course sits on the edge of a wetland.

They are talking about doing a two-lane redo of the bridge on Peter St., with a walking path, or a new bridge crossing the Tay River (see below). When you think of 2000 -  3000 people living here, and only one exit road, that would be tricky. In an opinion piece, Ramsey Hart explained that Perth is like the rest of the province, the town is desperate for affordable housing, especially for the vulnerable. He is the ED for The Table, our local food bank. I agree with him. But I am not a Perth resident, and I don't really have a say. I am interested in the process. 


This is the Peter St. bridge leading to the golf course.
It is the only access point.

I am curious about infrastructure. The Perth town plan states its goal:
"Policy 1.2.1 To provide for a compact and energy efficient land use pattern that optimizes the use of available infrastructure (roads, water, sewer, waste disposal) and public service facilities (schools, hospitals, recreation and cultural facilities, fire and police) and which utilizes densities and development standards which are cost effective."
"Section 8.1.4.2 – Development Concept states that: ... “The New Residential Area is anticipated to meet the mid to long-term growth and settlement needs of the Town...  Development may only proceed where the necessary urban infrastructure can be provided and adequate capacity is available, notably municipal (piped) water and sanitary sewer. "

On p. 24, they write about Phase 1, which includes discharging treated stormwater into Grants Creek Provincially Significant Wetland. "An Integrated Hydrological Impact Assessment will be completed to determine how the wetland may be altered by the discharge of treated stormwater into it. " The Environment Ministry, RVCA, and Department of Fisheries and Oceans, will monitor it.

I wonder if there are reports of spring flooding? The golf course is on the edge of Perth, RVCA provides data on watersheds

This area, the golf course (upper right), is part of Grant's Creek watershed.
Grant's Creek watershed

 This RVCA subwatershed report falls outside the town boundary, but the Tay River (35 km) connects theses two watershed areas. 

Tay River subwatershed

Perth is contemplating a $300,000 upgrade to the water tower. Probably a good idea considering these circumstances. That has to be done in June or September, the shoulder seasons, as the town water has to shut down during the process. 

"A second water tower was discussed last year by council. Machan said this will be required when a large residential or commercial development takes place that requires additional flow."

We shall see what they decide! 

9 comments:

Tom said...

...building is a constant thing.

Barbara Rogers said...

How interesting. I'm involved with a group called the Swannanoa Watershed Action Network...which has just formed with ecological and business interests in our Swannanoa River Valley which is part of the larger watershed wheich includes Asheville. Looking at a watershed is a great way to consider the balance of societal needs (housing, jobs, schools, transport) in relation to nature or global needs (clean water, air, soil, support for animals, forests etc.) If you're interested in this model, it follows the Doughnut Ecomomic principal which I've talked about before. Kate Raworth gave a TED talk about it.

Karen said...

Everyone yammers on about affordable housing but I don't see any being built. It's the same here.

Cloudia said...

You are a vigilant protector of your home and our prayers go with you

Kenneth Cole Schneider said...

It is difficult when social needs have priority over conservation wishes. It is good that the new housing will be concentrated rather than spread all over the rural countryside.

Penelope Notes said...

Unfortunately, seems like affordable and housing are two words that do not fit together and have not for some time. It is talked about a lot, however, so maybe someday??!

Gill - That British Woman said...

all the green areas are going to be lost at this rate......

Yogi♪♪♪ said...

Kind of hard to figure out but it does look like the development will be shoehorned close to two waterways. But you know people have to live somewhere.

Here, if you are in an unincorporated area, just go do what you want.

Bleubeard and Elizabeth said...

Glad you are keeping up with this and are vigilant. Keep up your good fight.