Then there are the banners, that threaten to cut off a reporter. |
Now, I listen to the radio, while I blog in the early morning. Then, while I work out, I watch the morning news, zipping around from CBCNN, CNN, to any other news shows to keep me interested and moving.
I am amazed at the length of the Press Conference coverage on TV news shows. I get news alerts through Twitter and email. I know when something has happened. CTV is usually the first to report in Canada. However, I'm finding that the media are running press conferences for far too long. Or, the introduction takes a long time, when that merciless bottom banner, explaining the story, gives the entire message.
Our CBCNN is the worst for banners That and using YouTube videos as 'news' |
Save me from them! |
Poor woman, cut off at the neck! |
The questions, to be fair, are often repeated over and over, with the same question asked, i.e., when will hydro, water, the trains, etc., be resumed? Often the answer is unknown. Yet they ask it over and over, failing to listen to the response: "We don't know." or "Crews are working hard."
I would prefer that the media director limits the press conference to the statement and a few questions, and then going back to the show host. Later, have someone edit the conference to timely statements, as they do later, but not during.
Dan Gardner was interviewed on The Current. The guest host tried to suck him into making pronouncements after the train explosions in Lac–Mégantic He refrained. Bless him.
@TheCurrentCBC Q: Is this a wake-up call? @dgardner : NO! Let's get the facts 1st and determine our next action.
Cannot see the players! |
1 comment:
Hari OM
Oh those bottom-banners; so 'inyerface' and totally distracting. Let the newsreader do the job for Heaven's sake!!! Not that I watch any telly these days - ashrams tend not to encourage it and it has not been missed let me tell you.
I am, however, currently tuned into BBC radio coverage of the Ashes Test Cricket over the interwebber!
&*> YAM xx
Post a Comment