David Eaves wrote in part, in an article Dec., 2009,
 The Supreme Court of Canada: There are no journalists, only   citizens about Internet libel laws:
...Supreme  Court of Canada  ruled that a libel claim can be defeated even when the  facts or  allegations made turn out to be false... as long as the story  was in  the public interest and I met a certain standard around trying  to  ascertain the truth. In short, my intentions, not my output, is  what  matters most. 
This new line of defense has a fancy new name  to go with it... the  defence of responsible communication.... 
Notice  how it isn't called "the defence of responsible  journalism?"  (although, ahem, someone should   let CTV know). This story matters as it demonstrates that the law   is finally beginning to grasp what the internet means for our democracy   and society. 
Sadly, the   Globe, CBC,   National   Post and CTV   (indeed everyone with the exception of Colby   Cosh at Macleans) all framed the decision as being about  journalism  and journalists.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for stopping by and commenting. I am so glad to have you here! Fans, blog buddies, and positive, constructive comments, make my day. 'Anonymous' creeps me out!